Preoperative Imaging-Guided Surgical Planning in Complex Pelvic Fractures - Innovations in Traumatology and Radiology for Enhanced Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v11i2.313Palabras clave:
complex pelvic fractures, preoperative imaging, 3D reconstruction, trauma surgery, advanced imagingResumen
This systematic review will explore role of preoperative imaging-guided surgical planning for the management of complex pelvic fractures. Pelvic fractures occurs in high-energy trauma and cause challenges for intricate anatomy and have a high association with vascular, visceral injuries. Traditional imaging methods frequently fail to capture injury complexity while increasing surgical risks. Recent advancements of imaging technology CT, MRI, 3D reconstructions along with and AI-based predictive models offer enhanced precision in diagnosing and planning surgical interventions with detailed insights into fracture patterns, bone density, and soft tissue damage which enable accurate surgical planning to reduce intraoperative complications and shorten recovery times. We aim to systematically investigate effectiveness of modern imaging techniques with potencies in clinical outcomes, with an emphasis on improved surgical accuracy and patient safety. Analyzing range of studies, we have established evidence-based recommendations for integrating advanced imaging technologies into routine trauma care showing critical role these innovations play in improving both short-term recovery and long-term clinical outcomes for patients having complex pelvic fractures.
Descargas
Citas
Benady, A., Meyer, S. J., Golden, E., Dadia, S., & Levy, G. K. (2023). Patient-specific Ti-6Al-4V lattice implants for critical-sized load-bearing bone defects reconstruction. Materials & Design, 226, 111605.
Cheung, J., Wong, C. K. K., Yang, M. L. C., Wong, O. F., Cheung, M., Lui, C. T., & Tsui, K. L. (2021). Young–Burgess classification: inter-observer and inter-method agreement between pelvic radiograph and computed tomography in emergency polytrauma management. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 28(3), 143-151.
Costantini, T. W., Coimbra, R., Holcomb, J. B., Podbielski, J. M., Catalano, R., Blackburn, A., ... & AAST Pelvic Fracture Study Group. (2016). Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: Results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 80(5), 717-725.
Geannette, C., Lee, S. C., & Sneag, D. B. (2020). Etiology of lumbosacral radiculoplexopathy: sacral insufficiency fracture on magnetic resonance imaging. HSS Journal®, 16(2), 126-129.
Greffier, J., Dabli, D., Kammoun, T., Goupil, J., Berny, L., Touimi Benjelloun, G., ... & Frandon, J. (2022). Retrospective Analysis of Doses Delivered during Embolization Procedures over the Last 10 Years. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(10), 1701.
Hasegawa, I. G., & Gary, J. L. (2024). Intraoperative imaging challenges during pelvic ring disruptions and acetabular fracture surgery. Orthopedic Clinics, 55(1), 73-87.
Kuttner, H., Benninger, E., Fretz, V., & Meier, C. (2022). Fluoroscopy-guided vs. navigated iliosacral screw placement with intraoperative 3D scan or postoperative CT control: Impact of the clinical workflow on patients’ radiation exposure: Radiation exposure of different workflows for iliosacral screw placement. Injury, 53(11), 3764-3768.
Lell, M., & Kachelrieß, M. (2023). Computed tomography 2.0: new detector technology, AI, and other developments. Investigative Radiology, 58(8), 587-601.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Kevin Miranda Suárez , Mateo Daniel Fabara Vera , Giovanni Andres Arias Audor, Estefani Mishel Serrano Ordóñez , Carlos Luis Alava Salamea
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.